[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1505160305100.4923@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 03:11:01 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>
cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
"aleksey.makarov@...iga.com" <aleksey.makarov@...iga.com>,
James Hogan <James.Hogan@...tec.com>,
Paul Burton <Paul.Burton@...tec.com>,
"david.daney@...ium.com" <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"davidlohr@...com" <davidlohr@...com>,
"kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS64: Support of at least 48 bits of SEGBITS
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> > Many processors support larger VA space than is utilized by the kernel.
> > A choice was made to reduce the size of the VA space in order to
> > reduce TLB handling overhead.
> >
> > If the true reason for the patch is to enable larger VA space, say that.
> > But is it really required by those processors you mention? I doubt it.
>
> Well, I was not aware about many processors capability, I can't find this kind
> of note anywhere.
The R10000 and friends all have a 44-bit virtual address space, so this
is no news to Linux. This is noted in <asm/processor.h> right above the
change you made there.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists