[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150516231732.GA13265@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 02:17:32 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 03/28] memcg: adjust to support new THP refcounting
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 07:57:39AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 04:18 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> > But same question about whether it should be using hpage_nr_pages() instead
> >> > of a constant.
> > No. Compiler woundn't be able to optimize HPAGE_PMD_NR away for THP=n,
> > since compound value cross compilation unit barrier.
>
> What code are you talking about here, specifically? This?
>
> static inline int hpage_nr_pages(struct page *page)
> {
> if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page)))
> return HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> return 1;
> }
No. See for instance mem_cgroup_try_charge(). Vlastimil would like to
replace hpage_nr_pages() call with plain HPAGE_PMD_NR.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists