[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555A7087.5080409@sr71.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:06:47 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] x86, mpx: trace entry to bounds exception paths
On 05/18/2015 01:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> > This patch adds a trace point for the case where we are
>> > passing the exception up to userspace with a signal.
>> >
>> > We are also explicit that we're printing out the inverse of
>> > the 'upper' that we encounter. If you want to filter, for
>> > instance, you need to ~ the value first.
> Confused. What is the point of printing the complement of upper?
If a pointer's range is
0x1000 -> 0x2000
it is stored in the bounds table as (32-bits here for brevity):
lower: 0x00001000
upper: 0xffffdfff
That is so that an all 0's entry:
lower: 0x00000000
upper: 0x00000000
corresponds to the "init" bounds which store a *range* of:
0x00000000 -> 0xffffffff
The 'upper' stored in the table is gibberish to print by itself, so we
print ~upper to get the *actual*, logical value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists