[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555975F2.9090208@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:17:38 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP
to guard irq_common_data.node
On 2015/5/16 4:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA
>> to guard irq_common_data.node.
>
> Please move this change to the front and do it on irq_data. That would
> have avoided confusing Abel :)
Hi Thomas,
Reordering these two patches will cause too much unnecessary code
changes. so I will merge this patch into the patch to move node from
struct irq_data into struct irq_common_data, which is more
straight forward.
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists