| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 07:32:01 +0200
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: pebolle@...cali.nl, andreas.steffen@...ongswan.org, tytso@....edu,
sandyinchina@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] random: Blocking API for accessing nonblocking_pool
Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2015, 14:46:26 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:54:41PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > /*
> >
> > + * Equivalent function to get_random_bytes with the difference that this
> > + * function blocks the request until the nonblocking_pool is initialized.
> > + */
> > +void get_blocking_random_bytes(void *buf, int nbytes)
> > +{
> > + if (unlikely(nonblocking_pool.initialized == 0))
> > + wait_event_interruptible(urandom_init_wait,
> > + nonblocking_pool.initialized);
> > + extract_entropy(&nonblocking_pool, buf, nbytes, 0, 0);
>
> So what if the wait was interrupted? You are going to extract
> entropy from an empty pool.
>
> Anyway, you still haven't addressed my primary concern with this
> model which is the potential for dead-lock. Sleeping for an open
> period of time like this in a work queue is bad form. It may also
> lead to dead-locks if whatever you're waiting for happened to use
> the same work thread.
>
> That's why I think you should simply provide a function and data
> pointer which random.c can then stash onto a list to call when
> the pool is ready.
Thanks for the hint to the list. Before handing in another formal patch, may i ask for checking the following approach? I would think that this one should cover your concerns.
diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 9cd6968..9bc2a57 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -409,6 +409,19 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(random_write_wait);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(urandom_init_wait);
static struct fasync_struct *fasync;
+static LIST_HEAD(random_wait_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(random_wait_list_mutex);
+struct random_work {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct work_struct rw_work;
+ void *rw_buf;
+ int rw_len;
+ void *rw_private;
+ void (*rw_cb)(void *buf, int buflen,
+ void *private);
+};
+static void process_random_waiters(void);
+
/**********************************************************************
*
* OS independent entropy store. Here are the functions which handle
@@ -660,6 +673,7 @@ retry:
r->entropy_total = 0;
if (r == &nonblocking_pool) {
prandom_reseed_late();
+ process_random_waiters();
wake_up_interruptible(&urandom_init_wait);
pr_notice("random: %s pool is initialized\n", r->name);
}
@@ -1778,3 +1792,64 @@ void add_hwgenerator_randomness(const char *buffer, size_t count,
credit_entropy_bits(poolp, entropy);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_hwgenerator_randomness);
+
+static void process_random_waiters(void)
+{
+ struct random_work *rw = NULL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&random_wait_list_mutex);
+ while (!list_empty(&random_wait_list)) {
+ rw = list_first_entry(&random_wait_list, struct random_work,
+ list);
+ list_del(&rw->list);
+ schedule_work(&rw->rw_work);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&random_wait_list_mutex);
+}
+
+static void get_blocking_random_bytes_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct random_work *rw = container_of(work, struct random_work,
+ rw_work);
+
+ get_random_bytes(rw->rw_buf, rw->rw_len);
+ rw->rw_cb(rw->rw_buf, rw->rw_len, rw->rw_private);
+ kfree(rw);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Equivalent function to get_random_bytes with the difference that this
+ * function blocks the request until the nonblocking_pool is initialized.
+ */
+int get_blocking_random_bytes_cb(void *buf, int nbytes, void *private,
+ void (*cb)(void *buf, int buflen,
+ void *private))
+{
+ struct random_work *rw = NULL;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&random_wait_list_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(rw, &random_wait_list, list)
+ if (buf == rw->rw_buf)
+ goto out;
+
+ rw = kmalloc(sizeof(struct random_work), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rw) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ INIT_WORK(&rw->rw_work, get_blocking_random_bytes_work);
+ rw->rw_buf = buf;
+ rw->rw_len = nbytes;
+ rw->rw_private = private;
+ rw->rw_cb = cb;
+ list_add_tail(&rw->list, &random_wait_list);
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&random_wait_list_mutex);
+ if (nonblocking_pool.initialized)
+ process_random_waiters();
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_blocking_random_bytes_cb);
diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
index b05856e..b57525f 100644
--- a/include/linux/random.h
+++ b/include/linux/random.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ extern void add_interrupt_randomness(int irq, int irq_flags);
extern void get_random_bytes(void *buf, int nbytes);
extern void get_random_bytes_arch(void *buf, int nbytes);
+extern int get_blocking_random_bytes_cb(void *buf, int nbytes, void *private,
+ void (*cb)(void *buf, int buflen,
+ void *private));
void generate_random_uuid(unsigned char uuid_out[16]);
extern int random_int_secret_init(void);
--
2.1.0
--
Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists