lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150518064552.GA12869@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 08:45:52 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Cc:	juri.lelli@....com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
	andrey.semin@...el.com
Subject: Re: Regression: turbostat stops working after suspend/resume cycle


* Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've recently noticed that if I suspend and resume my laptop, I can no
> longer execute turbostat. This is what I get when I try to start it:
> # turbostat
> Could not migrate to CPU 1
> turbostat: re-initialized with num_cpus 4
> Could not migrate to CPU 1
> 
> Since everything works as expected with v4.0, I ran a bisection and
> found that commit 3c18d447b3b36a8d ("sched/core: Check for available
> DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()") is the cause of the regression.
> 
> I don't know if there's something else affected by that change, but
> I can consistently reproduce the bug with turbostat.
> 
> I can provide more info if needed.

Does this commit:

  533445c6e533 sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend

which is already in Linus's tree, and which should be part of -rc4, 
fix it? Also attached below.

Thanks,

	Ingo

====================>
>From 533445c6e53368569e50ab3fb712230c03d523f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 03:09:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend

Commit 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in
cpuset_cpu_inactive()"), a SCHED_DEADLINE bugfix, had a logic error that
caused a regression in setting a CPU inactive during suspend. I ran into
this when a program was failing pthread_setaffinity_np() with EINVAL after
a suspend+wake up.

A simple reproducer:

	$ ./a.out
	sched_setaffinity: Success
	$ systemctl suspend
	$ ./a.out
	sched_setaffinity: Invalid argument

... where ./a.out is:

	#define _GNU_SOURCE
	#include <errno.h>
	#include <sched.h>
	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <stdlib.h>
	#include <string.h>
	#include <unistd.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		long num_cores;
		cpu_set_t cpu_set;
		int ret;

		num_cores = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
		CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set);
		CPU_SET(num_cores - 1, &cpu_set);
		errno = 0;
		ret = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(cpu_set), &cpu_set);
		perror("sched_setaffinity");
		return ret ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
	}

The mistake is that suspend is handled in the action ==
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN case of the switch statement in
cpuset_cpu_inactive().

However, the commit in question masked out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN
from the action, making this case dead.

The fix is straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1cb5ecb3d6543c38cce5790387f336f54ec8e2bc.1430733960.git.osandov@osandov.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 34db9bf892a3..57bd333bc4ab 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6999,27 +6999,23 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	long cpu = (long)hcpu;
 	struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+	bool overflow;
+	int cpus;
 
-	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+	switch (action) {
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-		/* explicitly allow suspend */
-		if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
-			bool overflow;
-			int cpus;
-
-			rcu_read_lock_sched();
-			dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+		rcu_read_lock_sched();
+		dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
 
-			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-			cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
-			overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
-			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+		cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
+		overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 
-			rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+		rcu_read_unlock_sched();
 
-			if (overflow)
-				return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
-		}
+		if (overflow)
+			return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
 		cpuset_update_active_cpus(false);
 		break;
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ