[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431939405.8312.3.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:56:45 +0800
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: add secondary_startup_arm prototype in
header file
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 22:19 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:02:40AM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 2015-05-16 9:58 GMT+02:00 Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>:
> > > Put secondary_startup_arm() prototype in arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > so users doesn't have to add extern prototype in their code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > index 18f5a55..f5cffb7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct secondary_data {
> > > extern struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> > > extern volatile int pen_release;
> > > extern void secondary_startup(void);
> > > +extern void secondary_startup_arm(void);
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>
> This change should also end up in the patch system as its core ARM stuff,
> especially if it's not scheduled for merging through arm-soc.
>
Russell,
Thanks. I just put these 2 patches into the patch system.
Since patch 7/9 depends on this patch, I think we should merge this
patch(2/9) through arm-soc tree to prevent build fail.
Joe.C
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists