[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431940098.20417.83.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:08:18 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mgorman@...e.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, juri.lelli@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] sched,numa: pinned task accounting
On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a first few patches that provide pinned task accounting; they are boot
> tested only so far.
>
> I don't think this is enough to address Artem's regression, but its a
> foundation to add some more smarts. In particular we should make it harder
> still to migrate well placed tasks away due to these pinned tasks.
Hi,
the most useful thing I can do is to test your patches, which I did, and
there seem to be no difference: average server response time is still
1.4 seconds.
Artem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists