[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcO1nWFsOrubEDO0wU=+Dubk3tx1UFB-Za+W0Nxd=V1i7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:25 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86: Pack function addresses tightly as well
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> With function packing, they compress into:
>
> ffffffff817f2458 T _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> ffffffff817f2463 T _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore
So _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore is only 11 bytes long?
Sounds like it should have been inlined.
Is this with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINES=y ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists