[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5559B235.7030405@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:34:45 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>
CC: "dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] sched: Change sched_class::set_cpus_allowed
calling context
Hi Peter,
On 05/18/2015 09:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:37:43PM +0800, pang.xunlei@....com.cn wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> With this modification, I think the pushing action in my previous patch
>> "Check to push the task away after its affinity was changed" will not
>> be able to be implemented inside sched_class::set_cpus_allowed().
>
> Ah, right, I knew there was a patch I needed to look at.
>
> I'll try and not forget, but there's a few regression reports I need to
> look at first.
>
Apart from this (and the fact that I still have to look at Xunlei's patches too)
the changes seem ok with DL. Didn't test them yet though. I'll do it soon.
Best,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists