[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5559C24D.9010701@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:43:25 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: simplify timer initialisation and remove arm_timer.h
inclusion
Hi Russell,
On 18/05/15 11:40, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>>> The header asm/hardware/arm_timer.h is included in various machine
>>> specific files to access TIMER_CTRL and initialise to a known state.
>>> However that's not required as the clock{source,event} driver timer-sp
>>> initialises all the timer being used.
>>
>> I believe the idea is not to initialize the timers being used, but the
>> ones not being used and perhaps left running by the bootloader. Cases
>> where the interrupt is shared could cause a problem.
>
> Exactly. IMHO this code needs to stay.
>
Thanks for confirming.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists