[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55594BC0.9070005@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 22:17:36 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set
On 05/17/2015 01:30 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Given that kernel initiated association to isolcpus, a user turning
> NO_HZ_FULL_ALL on had better not have much generic load to manage. If
> he/she does not have CPUSETS enabled, or should Rik's patch rendering
> isolcpus immutable be merged,
My patch does not aim to make isolcpus immutable, it aims to make
isolcpus resistent to system management tools (like libvirt)
automatically undoing isolcpus the instant a cpuset with the default
cpus (inherited from the root group) is created.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists