[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1618479490.17551.1431972373169.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:06:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 linux-next] xfs: use swap() in
xfs_dir2_leafn_rebalance()
> On 18 May 2015 at 19:19 Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:13:48PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > * If the block order is wrong, swap the arguments.
> > */
> > - if ((swap = xfs_dir2_leafn_order(dp, blk1->bp, blk2->bp))) {
> > - xfs_da_state_blk_t *tmp; /* temp for block swap */
> > + swap = xfs_dir2_leafn_order(dp, blk1->bp, blk2->bp);
> > + if (swap)
> > + swap(blk1, blk2);
>
> Egads... Have you even read what you'd written? Yes, sure, preprocessor
> will do the right thing, but it's a very noticable annoyance for somebody
> reading that. Rename the bleeding flag, please.
I wanted to focus on the swap() update in this small patchset (some other things
should be done in there like have xfs_dir2_leafn_order() return bool) but I can
rename it in something like need_swap. Do I need to resend the 4 patches Dave ?
Regards,
Fabian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists