linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 linux-next] gfs2: fix shadow warning in gfs2_rbm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1431975184-1096-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 20:53:04 +0200
From:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 linux-next] gfs2: fix shadow warning in gfs2_rbm_find()

bi was already declared and initialized globally in gfs2_rbm_find()

Suggested-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
---
V2: use global bi instead of new call to rbm_bi()
on local variable.

 fs/gfs2/rgrp.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 900e515..cd53d6e 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1711,10 +1711,8 @@ static int gfs2_rbm_find(struct gfs2_rbm *rbm, u8 state, u32 *minext,
 		return ret;
 
 bitmap_full:	/* Mark bitmap as full and fall through */
-		if ((state == GFS2_BLKST_FREE) && initial_offset == 0) {
-			struct gfs2_bitmap *bi = rbm_bi(rbm);
+		if ((state == GFS2_BLKST_FREE) && initial_offset == 0)
 			set_bit(GBF_FULL, &bi->bi_flags);
-		}
 
 next_bitmap:	/* Find next bitmap in the rgrp */
 		rbm->offset = 0;
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/