linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 3/9] misc: sram: use phys_addr_t instead of u32 for physical address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 22:08:36 +0300
From:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] misc: sram: use phys_addr_t instead of u32 for physical address

To avoid any problems on non 32-bit platforms get and store memory
addresses under phys_addr_t type.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
---
Changes from v1 to v2:
- report size of SRAM in decimal format '%zu' instead of '%zx'
- replacement of denominator '1024' to SZ_1K requires explicit
  include of linux/sizes.h on some platforms, keep it as a number

 drivers/misc/sram.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
index 999684a..b7a3a24 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ struct sram_dev {
 
 struct sram_reserve {
 	struct list_head list;
-	u32 start;
-	u32 size;
+	phys_addr_t start;
+	size_t size;
 };
 
 static int sram_reserve_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a,
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct sram_dev *sram;
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *child;
-	unsigned long size, cur_start, cur_size;
+	phys_addr_t cur_start;
+	size_t size, cur_size;
 	struct sram_reserve *rblocks, *block;
 	struct list_head reserve_list;
 	unsigned int nblocks;
@@ -138,9 +139,9 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		block->size = resource_size(&child_res);
 		list_add_tail(&block->list, &reserve_list);
 
-		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found reserved block 0x%x-0x%x\n",
-			block->start,
-			block->start + block->size);
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found reserved block 0x%llx-0x%llx\n",
+			(unsigned long long)block->start,
+			(unsigned long long)block->start + block->size);
 
 		block++;
 	}
@@ -158,8 +159,9 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		/* can only happen if sections overlap */
 		if (block->start < cur_start) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-				"block at 0x%x starts after current offset 0x%lx\n",
-				block->start, cur_start);
+				"block at 0x%llx starts after current offset 0x%llx\n",
+				(unsigned long long)block->start,
+				(unsigned long long)cur_start);
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto err_chunks;
 		}
@@ -177,8 +179,9 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		 */
 		cur_size = block->start - cur_start;
 
-		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
-			cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%llx-0x%llx\n",
+			(unsigned long long)cur_start,
+			(unsigned long long)cur_start + cur_size);
 		ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
 				(unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
 				res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
@@ -193,7 +196,8 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
 
-	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "SRAM pool: %ld KiB @ 0x%p\n", size / 1024, virt_base);
+	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "SRAM pool: %zu KiB @ 0x%p\n",
+		size / 1024, virt_base);
 
 	return 0;
 
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/