[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150518200100.GY23057@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 22:01:00 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, dhowells@...hat.com, ming.lei@...onical.com,
seth.forshee@...onical.com, kyle@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com, tiwai@...e.de,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, wireless-regdb@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, jlee@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
John Griffin <john.griffin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/12] crypto: qat - address recursive dependency when
fw signing is enabled
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:06:35PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> See, FW_LOADER is 'y' unless EXPERT is set and one goes to the trouble
> of setting FW_LOADER to 'n'. So in the 100+ places where FW_LOADER is
> selected, that is done for, almost always, no immediate benefit.
> Changing those places to use
> depends on FW_LOADER
>
> should have no effect, I think. Except for the EXPERT people not wanting
> FW_LOADER. But that would be putting the burden where it belongs, I'd
> say.
Paul, how would you recommend we proceed with this? Should we go ahead and
change all 'select FW_LOADER' to 'depends on' ? If not does this need to be
fixed on kconfig?
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists