linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / sleep: Make ->enter_freeze callbacks depend on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4721283.2H3KXdSq7L@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 23:45:10 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / sleep: Make ->enter_freeze callbacks depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND

On Monday, May 18, 2015 02:18:26 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:38:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > The ->enter_freeze callbacks of cpuidle drivers are only used if
> > CONFIG_SUSPEND is set, so make them explicitly depend on that
> > Kconfig option.
> 
> No real objection, but is it worth it to sprinkle that CONFIG stuff over
> all drivers?

Well, you maybe right that it isn't.  The footprint is small anyway.

What about [1/2]?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/