[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505182354010.4225@nanos>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:54:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] x86, mpx: do not count MPX VMAs as neighbors when
unmapping
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The comment pretty much says it all.
>
> I wrote a test program that does lots of random allocations
> and forces bounds tables to be created. It came up with a
> layout like this:
>
> .... | BOUNDS DIRECTORY ENTRY COVERS | ....
> | BOUNDS TABLE COVERS |
> | BOUNDS TABLE | REAL ALLOC | BOUNDS TABLE |
>
> Unmapping "REAL ALLOC" should have been able to free the
> bounds table "covering" the "REAL ALLOC" because it was the
> last real user. But, the neighboring VMA bounds tables were
> found, considered as real neighbors, and we declined to free
> the bounds table covering the area.
>
> Doing this over and over left a small but significant number
> of these orphans. Handling them is fairly straighforward.
> All we have to do is walk the VMAs and skip all of the MPX
> ones when looking for neighbors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists