[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150519143801.8ba477c3813e93a2637c19cf@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:38:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@...il.com>,
zhang.zhanghailiang@...wei.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] userfaultfd v4
On Thu, 14 May 2015 19:30:57 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote:
> This is the latest userfaultfd patchset against mm-v4.1-rc3
> 2015-05-14-10:04.
It would be useful to have some userfaultfd testcases in
tools/testing/selftests/. Partly as an aid to arch maintainers when
enabling this. And also as a standalone thing to give people a
practical way of exercising this interface.
What are your thoughts on enabling userfaultfd for other architectures,
btw? Are there good use cases, are people working on it, etc?
Also, I assume a manpage is in the works? Sooner rather than later
would be good - Michael's review of proposed kernel interfaces has
often been valuable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists