[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519005354.GA21825@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:53:54 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Asynchronous device/driver probing support
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:48:19PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:45:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:39:49PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:20:02PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > This series is a combination of changes proposed by Luis a couple months
> > > > > ago and implementation used by Chrome OS. The issue we are trying to solve
> > > > > here is "slow" devices and drivers spending "too much time" in their probe()
> > > > > methods and it affects:
> > > > >
> > > > > - overall kernel boot process when drivers are compiled into the kernel
> > > > > and slow devices stall entire boot progress;
> > > > > - systemd desire to time out module loading process.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unlike Luis' proposal we do make use of asycn_schedule() infrastructure
> > > > > instead of using a dedicated workqueue, so all existing synchronization
> > > > > points in kernel that wait for device registration still work the same.
> > > > > Also, the asynchronous probing is done not only during driver registration
> > > > > (i.e. when devices are probed asynchronously only if they are registered
> > > > > before the driver), but also during device registration and deferred probe
> > > > > handling. This way slow devices do not stall kernel boot even when drivers
> > > > > are compiled into the kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > The last patch is for adventurous people to try and force
> > > > > fully-asynchronous boot. It works for me with limited success - I can boot
> > > > > Rockhip-based box to userspace as long as I force serial to be sychronously
> > > > > probed and ignore the fact that most devices are using "dummy" regulators
> > > > > as regulator subsystem really expects regulators to be registered in
> > > > > orderly fashion on OF-based systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes from v1:
> > > > >
> > > > > - Changed verbage in change logs and code to emphasise that
> > > > > PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS is a temporary measure and the end goal is
> > > > > to enable asynchronous probing by default, as requested by Tejun.
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me. Please feel free to add
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Greg, it would be great if it could make it in 4.1.
> >
> > It's on my list of patches to review next...
>
> Greg, could we make 4.2 please? ;)
Now queued up.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists