[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hfv6t10mg.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:34:47 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Koro Chen <koro.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Modify double acknowledged interrupts check condition
At Wed, 13 May 2015 22:39:03 +0800,
Koro Chen wrote:
>
> Currently in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0 during interrupt,
> we consider there were double acknowledged interrupts when:
> 1. HW reported pointer is smaller than expected, and
> 2. Time from last update time (hdelta) is over half a buffer time.
>
> However, when HW reported pointer is only a few bytes smaller than
> expected, and when hdelta is just a little larger than half a buffer time
> (e.g. ping-pong buffer), it wrongly treats this IRQ as double acknowledged.
>
> The condition #2 uses jiffies, but jiffies is not high resolution
> since it is integer. We should consider jiffies inaccuracy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koro Chen <koro.chen@...iatek.com>
The condition looks too strict, indeed. I applied the patch as is
now.
BTW, the similar check is already present for the free-wheeling case.
I'm going to clean up the code a bit for using the common code.
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> index ac6b33f..7d45645 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> if (delta > new_hw_ptr) {
> /* check for double acknowledged interrupts */
> hdelta = curr_jiffies - runtime->hw_ptr_jiffies;
> - if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2) {
> + if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2 + 1) {
> hw_base += runtime->buffer_size;
> if (hw_base >= runtime->boundary) {
> hw_base = 0;
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists