linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 15:43:39 +0800
From:	"Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>
To:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
CC:	joro@...tes.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, bhe@...hat.com,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	ddutile@...hat.com, ishii.hironobu@...fujitsu.com,
	doug.hatch@...com, jerry.hoemann@...com, tom.vaden@...com,
	li.zhang6@...com, lisa.mitchell@...com, billsumnerlinux@...il.com,
	rwright@...com, "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel

Hi Dave,

Don't worry :).
Of cause I have read your comments, but most of them contains no actual
code change request, so I did not reply them one by one.
When we are sure there is no actual code change needed, I will update
the comments and other format problems if necessary.

Regards
Zhenhua

On 05/19/2015 09:13 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/18/15 at 06:05pm, Li, ZhenHua wrote:
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> Testing from HP: passed.
>> Testing from He Baoquan(Redhat): passed
>>
>> The problem that dmar fault came again when running v10 with latest
>> kernel is fixed.
>> And I think there is no need to update the code to a new version now.
>>
>> So please tell me if there are still any code need to be changed.
>
> Have you reviewed all my comments? Although it is only iommu driver fixes,
> The patches are sent to lkml, no? If you do not want other people's comments
> why will you send to us? I would say do not assume it is a closed circle for
> only iommu driver.
>
> It is not easy to review patches actually, frankly I feel kernel code review
> is not so strict like the early days, maybe one reason is people are getting
> tired to argue.
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/