lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519074643.GM21663@sejong>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 16:46:43 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/40] perf record: Synthesize COMM event for a command
 line workload

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:45:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:30:50AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > When perf creates a new child to profile, the events are enabled on
> > exec().  And in this case, it doesn't synthesize any event for the
> > child since they'll be generated during exec().  But there's an window
> > between the enabling and the event generation.
> > 
> > It used to be overcome since samples are only in kernel (so we always
> > have the map) and the comm is overridden by a later COMM event.
> > However it won't work anymore since those samples will go to a missing
> > thread now but the COMM event will create a (current) thread.  This
> > leads to those early samples (like native_write_msr_safe) not having a
> > comm but pid (like ':15328').
>  
> > So it needs to synthesize COMM event for the child explicitly before
> > enabling so that it can have a correct comm.  But at this time, the
> > comm will be "perf" since it's not exec-ed yet.
> 
> This looks reasonable, but I think it probably needs to be done
> somewhere in perf_evlist__prepare_workload() or
> perf_evlist__start_workload(), as this affects other tools as well, like
> 'top', 'trace' and any other that may want to do this start-workload use
> case.

Hmm.. I need to look at this again as it only affects on processing
indexed data files which used to have a separate missing threads tree.
That's the reason why I didn't put it in a generic place like you
said.

However I changed not to use the separate tree - the purpose of the
tree was to reduce lock acquisition on thread searching but it already
grabs a rwlock with thread refcounting change.

Will check whether this is still needed..

Thanks,
Namhyung


> 
> I also wonder if we can't overcome this without using /proc, i.e.
> actually moving the "start the workload" to just before the fork, so
> that the kernel covers that as well.
> 
> Or, alternatively, the thread can be created without having to look at
> /proc at all, but by directly creating the struct thread, with the
> correct COMM, pid, etc, that we know, since we forked it, etc.
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  tools/perf/util/event.c     |  2 +-
> >  tools/perf/util/event.h     |  5 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 978ebf648aab..153f38e35555 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -766,8 +766,24 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Let the child rip
> >  	 */
> > -	if (forks)
> > +	if (forks) {
> > +		union perf_event *comm_event;
> > +
> > +		comm_event = malloc(sizeof(*comm_event) + machine->id_hdr_size);
> > +		if (comm_event == NULL)
> > +			goto out_child;
> > +
> > +		err = perf_event__synthesize_comm(tool, comm_event,
> > +						  rec->evlist->workload.pid,
> > +						  process_synthesized_event,
> > +						  machine);
> > +		free(comm_event);
> > +
> > +		if (err < 0)
> > +			goto out_child;
> > +
> >  		perf_evlist__start_workload(rec->evlist);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (opts->initial_delay) {
> >  		usleep(opts->initial_delay * 1000);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> > index 930d45d5a37a..3adca1302150 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/event.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int perf_event__prepare_comm(union perf_event *event, pid_t pid,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static pid_t perf_event__synthesize_comm(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > +pid_t perf_event__synthesize_comm(struct perf_tool *tool,
> >  					 union perf_event *event, pid_t pid,
> >  					 perf_event__handler_t process,
> >  					 struct machine *machine)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h
> > index 40e02544f861..9aacd558ac0f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/event.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h
> > @@ -452,6 +452,11 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events(struct perf_tool *tool,
> >  				       struct machine *machine,
> >  				       bool mmap_data);
> >  
> > +pid_t perf_event__synthesize_comm(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > +				  union perf_event *event, pid_t pid,
> > +				  perf_event__handler_t process,
> > +				  struct machine *machine);
> > +
> >  size_t perf_event__fprintf_comm(union perf_event *event, FILE *fp);
> >  size_t perf_event__fprintf_mmap(union perf_event *event, FILE *fp);
> >  size_t perf_event__fprintf_mmap2(union perf_event *event, FILE *fp);
> > -- 
> > 2.4.0
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ