linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/19] x86, mpx: trace entry to bounds exception paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505191016490.4225@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 10:17:17 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] x86, mpx: trace entry to bounds exception paths

On Mon, 18 May 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> There are two basic things that can happen as the result of
> a bounds exception (#BR):
> 
> 	1. We allocate a new bounds table
> 	2. We pass up a bounds exception to userspace.
> 
> This patch adds a trace point for the case where we are
> passing the exception up to userspace with a signal.
> 
> We are also explicit that we're printing out the inverse of
> the 'upper' that we encounter.  If you want to filter, for
> instance, you need to ~ the value first.  The reason we do
> this is because of how 'upper' is stored in the bounds table.
> If a pointer's range is:
> 
> 	0x1000 -> 0x2000
> 
> it is stored in the bounds table as (32-bits here for brevity):
> 
> 	lower: 0x00001000
> 	upper: 0xffffdfff
> 
> That is so that an all 0's entry:
> 
> 	lower: 0x00000000
> 	upper: 0x00000000
> 
> corresponds to the "init" bounds which store a *range* of:
> 
> 	0x00000000 -> 0xffffffff
> 
> That is, by far, the common case, and that lets us use the
> zero page, or deduplicate the memory, etc... The 'upper'
> stored in the table is gibberish to print by itself, so we
> print ~upper to get the *actual*, logical, human-readable
> value printed out.

Thanks for clarifying that!
 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/