linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: ensure attrs changes are properly synchronized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1432029828-3386-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 18:03:48 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: ensure attrs changes are properly synchronized

Current modification to attrs via sysfs is not fully synchronized.

Process A (change cpumask)      | Process B (change numa affinity)
wq_cpumask_store()              |
  wq_sysfs_prep_attrs()         |
                                | apply_workqueue_attrs()
  apply_workqueue_attrs()       |

It results that the Process B's operation is totally reverted
without any notification, it is a buggy behavior.  So this patch
moves wq_sysfs_prep_attrs() into the protection under wq_pool_mutex
to ensure attrs changes are properly synchronized.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 1c950f9..ee5bf95 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4958,18 +4958,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
 	struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+	apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
 	attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
 	if (!attrs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &attrs->nice) == 1 &&
 	    attrs->nice >= MIN_NICE && attrs->nice <= MAX_NICE)
-		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
 	else
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 
+out_unlock:
+	apply_wqattrs_unlock();
 	free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
 	return ret ?: count;
 }
@@ -4993,16 +4997,20 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
 	struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+	apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
 	attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
 	if (!attrs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	ret = cpumask_parse(buf, attrs->cpumask);
 	if (!ret)
-		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
 
+out_unlock:
+	apply_wqattrs_unlock();
 	free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
 	return ret ?: count;
 }
@@ -5026,18 +5034,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_numa_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
 	struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-	int v, ret;
+	int v, ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+	apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
 	attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
 	if (!attrs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	ret = -EINVAL;
 	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &v) == 1) {
 		attrs->no_numa = !v;
-		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+		ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
 	}
 
+out_unlock:
+	apply_wqattrs_unlock();
 	free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
 	return ret ?: count;
 }
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/