[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2959468.ToTK2pDZvV@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:56:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v2 0/9] x86: remove cpu_**_mask() functions
On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:19:04 AM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Two functions defined in asm/smp.h: cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask(),
> have the same functionality as macros defined in linux/topology.h:
> topology_thread_cpumask() and topology_core_cpumask() respectively.
>
> They are not documented and are architecture specific. Also: different
> naming for the same functionality (in case of cpu_sibling_mask() and
> topology_thread_cpumask()) is a bit misleading.
>
> This series makes all the callers switch to using the topology.h macros
> and removes their smp.h counterparts. While we're at it: rename
> topology_thread_cpumask() to topology_sibling_cpumask() to be
> consistent with the term used in the scheduler.
>
> The same duplication exists on powerpc.
>
> NOTE: patch 2/9 had been already submitted separately but didn't
> receive any attention, so I'm attaching it to this series.
>
> v2:
> - renamed topology_thread_cpumask() to topology_sibling_cpumask()
> - updated Documentation/cputopology.txt
>
> v1:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/30/188
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (9):
> topology: rename topology_thread_cpumask()
> Documentation: update cputopology.txt
> coretemp: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> powernow-k8: replace cpu_core_mask() with topology_core_cpumask()
> p4-clockmod: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> acpi-cpufreq: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask()
> speedstep-ich: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> x86: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask()
> x86: remove cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask()
>
> Documentation/cputopology.txt | 37 +++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_nohash.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 3 +-
> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h | 2 +-
> arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 10 ------
> arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 6 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 42 +++++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 2 +-
> drivers/base/topology.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 5 +--
> drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 13 ++-----
> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 2 +-
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 3 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-cpu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/service.c | 4 +--
> include/linux/topology.h | 6 ++--
> lib/cpu_rmap.c | 2 +-
> 29 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
Please feel free to add an ACK from me to the cpufreq-related ones.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists