[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555B2B67.9000002@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:24:07 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: arm-mhu: update the binding document
On 12/05/15 15:27, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Jassi,
>
> On 27/04/15 11:52, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> The initial version of the binding document pushed along with the driver
>> is not clear/explicit about couple of the required properties namely:
>> clocks and clock-names, though the AMBA primecell binding used by the
>> arm-mhu specifies them clearly. Without these property the driver will
>> not even get probed, so it is mandatory to have them in DT.
>>
>> This patch adds the above mentioned required properties to the binding.
>> It also adds the optional interrupt-names property which is good to have
>> along with some minor updates to replace references to the driver with
>> the hardware IP.
>>
>
> Can you review this ? It will be good to get this before v4.1 gets
> released, otherwise the binding will remain incomplete in v4.1 ?
>
Any update on this ?
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists