linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 26/28] thp: introduce deferred_split_huge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 15:54:44 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
CC:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 26/28] thp: introduce deferred_split_huge_page()

On 04/23/2015 11:04 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Currently we don't split huge page on partial unmap. It's not an ideal
> situation. It can lead to memory overhead.
>
> Furtunately, we can detect partial unmap on page_remove_rmap(). But we
> cannot call split_huge_page() from there due to locking context.
>
> It's also counterproductive to do directly from munmap() codepath: in
> many cases we will hit this from exit(2) and splitting the huge page
> just to free it up in small pages is not what we really want.
>
> The patch introduce deferred_split_huge_page() which put the huge page
> into queue for splitting. The splitting itself will happen when we get
> memory pressure via shrinker interface. The page will be dropped from
> list on freeing through compound page destructor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

> @@ -715,6 +726,12 @@ static inline pmd_t mk_huge_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
>   	return entry;
>   }
>
> +void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page[2].lru);

Wouldn't hurt to mention that you use page[2] because lru in page 1 
would collide with the dtor (right?).

> +	set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_transhuge_page);
> +}
> +
>   static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   					struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   					unsigned long haddr, pmd_t *pmd,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/