[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519145340.GI6203@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:53:40 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Optionally disable memcg by default using
Kconfig
On Tue 19-05-15 10:18:07, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> CC'ing Tejun and cgroups for the generic cgroup interface part
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
[...]
> > /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/mm/memcontrol.c 6.6441 395842
> > mem_cgroup_try_charge 2.950% 175781
>
> Ouch. Do you have a way to get the per-instruction breakdown of this?
> This function really isn't doing much. I'll try to reproduce it here
> too, I haven't seen such high costs with pft in the past.
>
> > try_charge 0.150% 8928
> > get_mem_cgroup_from_mm 0.121% 7184
Indeed! try_charge + get_mem_cgroup_from_mm which I would expect to be
the biggest consumers here are below 10% of the mem_cgroup_try_charge.
Other than that the function doesn't do much else than some flags
queries and css_put...
Do you have the full trace? Sorry for a stupid question but do inlines
from other header files get accounted to memcontrol.c?
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists