[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519150926.GP10274@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:09:27 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Huiquan Zhong <huiquan.zhong@...el.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> [150519 07:02]:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 04:04:43 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, May 18, 2015 04:44:01 PM Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
> > > boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
> > > functions:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> > > ...
> > > if (device_may_wakeup(dev)
> > > enable_irq_wake(irq);
> > > ...
> > > if (device_may_wakeup(dev)
> > > enable_irq_wake(irq);
> >
> > Closing parens are missin in the above two if () statements.
> >
> > Also, should the second one be disable_irq_wake(irq)?
Thanks yeah it should disable_irq_wake :) Will fix.
> > > ...
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> > > ...
> > >
> > > We can replace it with just the following init and exit
> > > time code:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> > > dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
> > > ...
> > > dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> > > ...
> > >
> > > And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> > > dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
> > > ...
> > > dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> > > device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> > > ...
> > >
> > > For now, let's only enable it for select PM_WAKEIRQ.
> >
> > Why? What would be wrong with doing that unconditionally?
No reason to make it conditional any longer. it's there from
the earlier version that only handled the dedicated wake IRQS.
> I mean, what about making it depend on CONFIG_PM directly?
OK let's do that.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists