| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150519151302.GG2462@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:13:02 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Optionally disable memcg by default using
Kconfig
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:53:40PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 19-05-15 10:18:07, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > CC'ing Tejun and cgroups for the generic cgroup interface part
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:40:57AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> [...]
> > > /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/mm/memcontrol.c 6.6441 395842
> > > mem_cgroup_try_charge 2.950% 175781
> >
> > Ouch. Do you have a way to get the per-instruction breakdown of this?
> > This function really isn't doing much. I'll try to reproduce it here
> > too, I haven't seen such high costs with pft in the past.
> >
> > > try_charge 0.150% 8928
> > > get_mem_cgroup_from_mm 0.121% 7184
>
> Indeed! try_charge + get_mem_cgroup_from_mm which I would expect to be
> the biggest consumers here are below 10% of the mem_cgroup_try_charge.
> Other than that the function doesn't do much else than some flags
> queries and css_put...
>
> Do you have the full trace? Sorry for a stupid question but do inlines
> from other header files get accounted to memcontrol.c?
>
The annotations for those functions look like with some very basic notes are
as follows. Note that I've done almost no research on this. I just noticed
that the memcg overhead was still there when looking for something else.
ffffffff811c15f0 <mem_cgroup_try_charge>: /* mem_cgroup_try_charge total: 176903 2.9692 */
765 0.0128 :ffffffff811c15f0: callq ffffffff816435e0 <__fentry__>
78 0.0013 :ffffffff811c15f5: push %rbp
1185 0.0199 :ffffffff811c15f6: mov %rsp,%rbp
356 0.0060 :ffffffff811c15f9: push %r14
209 0.0035 :ffffffff811c15fb: push %r13
1599 0.0268 :ffffffff811c15fd: push %r12
320 0.0054 :ffffffff811c15ff: mov %rcx,%r12
305 0.0051 :ffffffff811c1602: push %rbx
325 0.0055 :ffffffff811c1603: sub $0x10,%rsp
878 0.0147 :ffffffff811c1607: mov 0xb7501b(%rip),%ecx # ffffffff81d36628 <memory_cgrp_subsys+0x68>
571 0.0096 :ffffffff811c160d: test %ecx,%ecx
### MEL: Function entry, check for mem_cgroup_disabled()
:ffffffff811c160f: je ffffffff811c1630 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x40>
:ffffffff811c1611: xor %eax,%eax
:ffffffff811c1613: xor %ebx,%ebx
1 1.7e-05 :ffffffff811c1615: mov %rbx,(%r12)
7 1.2e-04 :ffffffff811c1619: add $0x10,%rsp
1211 0.0203 :ffffffff811c161d: pop %rbx
5 8.4e-05 :ffffffff811c161e: pop %r12
5 8.4e-05 :ffffffff811c1620: pop %r13
1249 0.0210 :ffffffff811c1622: pop %r14
7 1.2e-04 :ffffffff811c1624: pop %rbp
5 8.4e-05 :ffffffff811c1625: retq
:ffffffff811c1626: nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
295 0.0050 :ffffffff811c1630: mov (%rdi),%rax
160703 2.6973 :ffffffff811c1633: mov %edx,%r13d
#### MEL: I was surprised to see this atrocity. It's a PageSwapCache check
#### /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:311
#### /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/include/linux/page-flags.h:261
#### /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/mm/memcontrol.c:5473
####
#### Everything after here is consistent small amounts of overhead just from
#### being called a lot
179 0.0030 :ffffffff811c1636: test $0x10000,%eax
:ffffffff811c163b: je ffffffff811c1648 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x58>
:ffffffff811c163d: xor %eax,%eax
:ffffffff811c163f: xor %ebx,%ebx
:ffffffff811c1641: cmpq $0x0,0x38(%rdi)
:ffffffff811c1646: jne ffffffff811c1615 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x25>
1343 0.0225 :ffffffff811c1648: mov (%rdi),%rax
26 4.4e-04 :ffffffff811c164b: mov $0x1,%r14d
24 4.0e-04 :ffffffff811c1651: test $0x40,%ah
:ffffffff811c1654: je ffffffff811c1665 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x75>
:ffffffff811c1656: mov (%rdi),%rax
:ffffffff811c1659: test $0x40,%ah
:ffffffff811c165c: je ffffffff811c1665 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x75>
:ffffffff811c165e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%rcx
:ffffffff811c1662: shl %cl,%r14d
1225 0.0206 :ffffffff811c1665: mov 0xb74f35(%rip),%eax # ffffffff81d365a0 <do_swap_account>
66 0.0011 :ffffffff811c166b: test %eax,%eax
:ffffffff811c166d: jne ffffffff811c16a8 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0xb8>
3 5.0e-05 :ffffffff811c166f: mov %rsi,%rdi
22 3.7e-04 :ffffffff811c1672: callq ffffffff811bc920 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm>
1291 0.0217 :ffffffff811c1677: mov %rax,%rbx
3 5.0e-05 :ffffffff811c167a: mov %r14d,%edx
:ffffffff811c167d: mov %r13d,%esi
10 1.7e-04 :ffffffff811c1680: mov %rbx,%rdi
1380 0.0232 :ffffffff811c1683: callq ffffffff811c0950 <try_charge>
10 1.7e-04 :ffffffff811c1688: testb $0x1,0x74(%rbx)
1235 0.0207 :ffffffff811c168c: je ffffffff811c16d0 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0xe0>
7 1.2e-04 :ffffffff811c168e: cmp $0xfffffffc,%eax
:ffffffff811c1691: jne ffffffff811c1615 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x25>
:ffffffff811c1693: mov 0xb74f0e(%rip),%rbx # ffffffff81d365a8 <root_mem_cgroup>
:ffffffff811c169a: xor %eax,%eax
:ffffffff811c169c: jmpq ffffffff811c1615 <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x25>
:ffffffff811c16a1: nopl 0x0(%rax)
:ffffffff811c16a8: mov (%rdi),%rax
:ffffffff811c16ab: test $0x10000,%eax
:ffffffff811c16b0: je ffffffff811c166f <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x7f>
:ffffffff811c16b2: mov %rsi,-0x28(%rbp)
:ffffffff811c16b6: callq ffffffff811c0450 <try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page>
:ffffffff811c16bb: test %rax,%rax
:ffffffff811c16be: mov %rax,%rbx
:ffffffff811c16c1: mov -0x28(%rbp),%rsi
:ffffffff811c16c5: jne ffffffff811c167a <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x8a>
:ffffffff811c16c7: jmp ffffffff811c166f <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x7f>
:ffffffff811c16c9: nopl 0x0(%rax)
:ffffffff811c16d0: mov 0x18(%rbx),%rdx
:ffffffff811c16d4: test $0x3,%dl
:ffffffff811c16d7: jne ffffffff811c16df <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0xef>
:ffffffff811c16d9: decq %gs:(%rdx)
:ffffffff811c16dd: jmp ffffffff811c168e <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x9e>
:ffffffff811c16df: lea 0x10(%rbx),%rdi
:ffffffff811c16e3: lock subq $0x1,0x10(%rbx)
:ffffffff811c16e9: je ffffffff811c16ed <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0xfd>
:ffffffff811c16eb: jmp ffffffff811c168e <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x9e>
:ffffffff811c16ed: mov %eax,-0x28(%rbp)
:ffffffff811c16f0: callq *0x20(%rbx)
:ffffffff811c16f3: mov -0x28(%rbp),%eax
:ffffffff811c16f6: jmp ffffffff811c168e <mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x9e>
:ffffffff811c16f8: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
ffffffff811bc920 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm>: /* get_mem_cgroup_from_mm total: 7251 0.1217 */
#### MEL: Nothing really big jumped out there at me.
1318 0.0221 :ffffffff811bc920: callq ffffffff816435e0 <__fentry__>
19 3.2e-04 :ffffffff811bc925: push %rbp
42 7.0e-04 :ffffffff811bc926: mov %rsp,%rbp
1278 0.0215 :ffffffff811bc929: jmp ffffffff811bc94b <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x2b>
:ffffffff811bc92b: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
1259 0.0211 :ffffffff811bc930: testb $0x1,0x74(%rdx)
161 0.0027 :ffffffff811bc934: jne ffffffff811bc980 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x60>
:ffffffff811bc936: mov 0x18(%rdx),%rax
:ffffffff811bc93a: test $0x3,%al
:ffffffff811bc93c: jne ffffffff811bc985 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x65>
:ffffffff811bc93e: incq %gs:(%rax)
:ffffffff811bc942: mov $0x1,%eax
:ffffffff811bc947: test %al,%al
:ffffffff811bc949: jne ffffffff811bc980 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x60>
13 2.2e-04 :ffffffff811bc94b: test %rdi,%rdi
:ffffffff811bc94e: je ffffffff811bc96c <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x4c>
47 7.9e-04 :ffffffff811bc950: mov 0x340(%rdi),%rax
1410 0.0237 :ffffffff811bc957: test %rax,%rax
:ffffffff811bc95a: je ffffffff811bc96c <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x4c>
26 4.4e-04 :ffffffff811bc95c: mov 0xca0(%rax),%rax
179 0.0030 :ffffffff811bc963: mov 0x70(%rax),%rdx
174 0.0029 :ffffffff811bc967: test %rdx,%rdx
:ffffffff811bc96a: jne ffffffff811bc930 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x10>
:ffffffff811bc96c: mov 0xb79c35(%rip),%rdx # ffffffff81d365a8 <root_mem_cgroup>
1 1.7e-05 :ffffffff811bc973: testb $0x1,0x74(%rdx)
:ffffffff811bc977: je ffffffff811bc936 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x16>
:ffffffff811bc979: nopl 0x0(%rax)
1299 0.0218 :ffffffff811bc980: mov %rdx,%rax
4 6.7e-05 :ffffffff811bc983: pop %rbp
21 3.5e-04 :ffffffff811bc984: retq
:ffffffff811bc985: testb $0x2,0x18(%rdx)
:ffffffff811bc989: jne ffffffff811bc9d2 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0xb2>
:ffffffff811bc98b: mov 0x10(%rdx),%rcx
:ffffffff811bc98f: test %rcx,%rcx
:ffffffff811bc992: je ffffffff811bc9d2 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0xb2>
:ffffffff811bc994: lea 0x1(%rcx),%rsi
:ffffffff811bc998: lea 0x10(%rdx),%r8
:ffffffff811bc99c: mov %rcx,%rax
:ffffffff811bc99f: lock cmpxchg %rsi,0x10(%rdx)
:ffffffff811bc9a5: cmp %rcx,%rax
:ffffffff811bc9a8: mov %rax,%rsi
:ffffffff811bc9ab: jne ffffffff811bc9b4 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x94>
:ffffffff811bc9ad: mov $0x1,%eax
:ffffffff811bc9b2: jmp ffffffff811bc947 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x27>
:ffffffff811bc9b4: test %rsi,%rsi
:ffffffff811bc9b7: je ffffffff811bc9d2 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0xb2>
:ffffffff811bc9b9: lea 0x1(%rsi),%rcx
:ffffffff811bc9bd: mov %rsi,%rax
:ffffffff811bc9c0: lock cmpxchg %rcx,(%r8)
:ffffffff811bc9c5: cmp %rax,%rsi
:ffffffff811bc9c8: je ffffffff811bc9ad <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x8d>
:ffffffff811bc9ca: mov %rax,%rsi
:ffffffff811bc9cd: test %rsi,%rsi
:ffffffff811bc9d0: jne ffffffff811bc9b9 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x99>
:ffffffff811bc9d2: xor %eax,%eax
:ffffffff811bc9d4: jmpq ffffffff811bc947 <get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x27>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists