lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5419.1432061272@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 19:47:52 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mmarek@...e.cz,
	mjg59@...f.ucam.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
	dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	seth.forshee@...onical.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: sign-file and detached PKCS#7 firmware signatures

Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:

> I'll also mention:
> 
> ---
> The $DIGEST_ALGORITHM needs to be supported on the running kernel and           
> can differ from CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_HASH.
> ---
> 
> As I do no think that is quite obvious to a system integrator at first.

Actually, this isn't necessarily so for the firmware.

It *is* for the module signing, but you can always load the module to give you
the digest algorithm (or public key algorithm) for the firmware.

Though you would still have to be careful with firmware loaded during the
initramfs phase.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ