lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2015 01:11:39 +0530
From:	Jagan Teki <jteki@...nedev.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Use BIT macro from include/linux/bitops.h

On 21 May 2015 at 00:52, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 05/18/2015 01:14 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>
>> Replace (1 << nr) to BIT(nr) where nr = 0, 1, 2 .... 31
>
>
> I don't like it, I think it hurts readability.

What do you mean by don't like, using kernel defined macro instead of
numerical assignments huts readability?

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki,
Openedev.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ