[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPeDSOwRU4Btt97Tf6Qd1zj5ctVnL_3-_RWGSy004SAACA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:03:40 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: tegra: Use labels for overriding
nodes in Tegra114 boards
2015-05-20 13:05 GMT+09:00 Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com> wrote:
>> Usage of labels instead of full paths reduces possible mistakes when
>> overriding nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
>
> Indentation seems to be off by one tab in the added code (hence the
> huge size of this patch ; most lines should not change), can you
> check?
It is correct. This change in indentation is an effect of moving nodes
out of first bracket ("\ {"). That is the convention.
It us up to you guys if this is worth the effort. For exynos we use
label-convention and now I am converting old DTS to it. I think the
label-convention is less error-prone when extending or overriding
nodes. Also it removes duplicated addresses.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists