[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520152538.15e7a1cc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:25:38 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 20 May 2015 05:41:46 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> wrote:
>
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c: In function 'create_queue_cpsch':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:888:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'init_sdma_vm' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > init_sdma_vm(dqm, q, qpd);
> > ^
> >
> > Caused by commit 3e3f6e1a90a8 ("drm/amdkfd: make the sdma vm init to be
> > asic specific").
> >
> > I have used the drm tree from next-20150519 for today.
>
> Okay this looks like a silent conflict, I'll have to pull Linus tree into
> drm-next and fix it up there.
Yep, against commit 79b066bd76d5 ("drm/amdkfd: Initialize sdma vm when
creating sdma queue") which is in v4.1-rc3.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists