[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432104079-2881-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:41:18 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] workqueue: remove the lock from wq_sysfs_prep_attrs()
Reading to wq->unbound_attrs requires protection of either wq_pool_mutex
or wq->mutex, and wq_sysfs_prep_attrs() is called with wq_pool_mutex held,
so we don't need to grab wq->mutex here.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a04a9cd3..81b0e0d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4941,13 +4941,13 @@ static struct workqueue_attrs *wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+
attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!attrs)
return NULL;
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
copy_workqueue_attrs(attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
- mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
return attrs;
}
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists