[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520065736.GI3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:57:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sarbojit Ganguly <ganguly.s@...sung.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Waiman.Long@...com" <Waiman.Long@...com>,
"raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com"
<raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@...sung.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
VIKRAM MUPPARTHI <vikram.m@...sung.com>,
SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI <suneel@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:09:34AM +0000, Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
> Yes, the main advantage of Qspinlock code can be observed in NUMA but
> when I tested in an embedded system, a slight advantage was observed.
OK, great!
This is the first !x86 port I'm aware of and a load-store arch at that,
so its good to hear our efforts at making it generic actually paid off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists