[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbupBQBsymB4wcC9XxbFJMhzxoZVXhyKxZT+xxuSxwifA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:21:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Grygorii.Strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: debugfs: display gpios requested as irq only
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> What? If I wanted a stable interface I would use sysfs and document
>> the ABI in Documentation/ABI/*.
>>
>> debugfs is not ABI.
>
> As I mentioned in my response to Grygorii, not everyone -- and most
> notably apparently not even Linus Torvalds -- agrees on this:
Yeah I was sloppy I guess.
What I mean, precisely is that sysfs is ABI, whether documented or
not.
Even debugfs is actually blurry, as per
Documentation/filesystems/debugfs.txt:
"The debugfs filesystem is also intended to not serve as a stable
ABI to user space; in theory, there are no stability constraints placed on
files exported there. The real world is not always so simple, though [1];
even debugfs interfaces are best designed with the idea that they will need
to be maintained forever."
But I haven't been bitten by it yet so that's why I allow some poetic
license.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists