[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520083313.GA3166@sudip-PC>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:03:13 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 WIP 5/5] paride: use new parport device model
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Sudip,
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:46:17 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > modify paride driver to use the new parallel port device model.
>
> Leading capital please ;-)
yes, its the linux habit of writing in small letters. :)
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> >
> > + }
> > + par_cb->flags = 0;
> > + par_cb->wakeup = pi_wake_up;
> > + par_cb->private = (void *)pi;
> > + pi->pardev = parport_register_dev_model(port, pi->device, par_cb,
> > + unit);
>
> If pi->device already includes the device number, and you are passing
> it again as unit, won't you end up with odd names like pcd0.0, pcd1.1,
> pcd2.2 etc?
yes, it is. This is the only driver using parport where in the probe
i had to use strncmp again.
>
> > parport_put_port(port);
> > + kfree(par_cb);
>
> If you don't need par_cb anywhere else then you shouldn't be allocating
> it dynamically. It's small enough to fit on the stack really.
like you suggested, I will make it local in all the drivers.
regards
sudip.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists