[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555C4CA1.3080704@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:58:09 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
CC: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, bdas@...hat.com,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] KVM: multiple address spaces (for SMM)
On 20/05/2015 10:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> So in essence this allows to have each vcpu in separate address space if
> necessary. These address space might overlap or be identical and allow
> permutations by having different memslots for each address space.
> And we can have several address spaces per vcpu. Correct?
Yes, exactly.
I've also posted QEMU patches that may give more insight on how this is
used.
Paolo
> This might be useful for kvm on s390 (e.g. we did the ucontrol thing that
> also has one guest address space per vcpu). I need to have a look at that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists