linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] spi: spidev: Add Google SPI flash compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150520103746.GD21577@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2015 11:37:46 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	David Hendricks <dhendrix@...gle.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] spi: spidev: Add Google SPI flash compatible
 string

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 05/20/2015 12:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This is adding a binding with no documentation, documentation is
> > mandatory for all bindings.

> Yes, I missed... sorry about that. Do you agree with the approach
> though so I can re-spin the patches adding the missing DT binding?

It's probably OK but I didn't really drill through since the binding was
missing.  If these parts are commodity as described it seems surprising
that they aren't compatible with any existing kernel driver.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)