[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520114125.GA31212@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:41:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86, mwaitt: introduce mwaitx idle with a
configurable timer
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - MWAITX takes a 'timeout' parameter, but otherwise behaves exactly
> > like MWAIT: i.e. once idle it won't exit idle on its own
>
> Let me quote the commit message:
>
> "MWAITT, another name is MWAITX (MWAIT with extensions), has a
> configurable timer that causes MWAITX to exit on expiration."
Ah. A useful skill that is, being able to read.
> You need to set the second bit in ECX to enable the timer.
>
> I guess if you don't, then you get normal MWAIT but then you don't
> need the timeout either...
Yeah.
So if it's a true timeout then we could use it to implement irq-less
timers: that's actually pretty useful, because it could be faster than
getting a local APIC timer irq, etc.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists