[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505201144370.4225@nanos>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
cc: joro@...tes.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5 3/9] iommu, x86: Abstract modify_irte() to accept two format
of irte
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Feng Wu wrote:
> After introducing VT-d posted-interrupts, we have two format
> of IRTE: remapped and posted. This patch make modify_irte()
> suitable for both of them.
> static int modify_irte(struct irq_2_iommu *irq_iommu,
> - struct irte *irte_modified)
> + void *data)
That's hardly an abstraction. You just make the pointer void so you
can hand in arbitrary nonsense.
And with the new struct you having crap like this:
+ memcpy(irte_pi, &ir_data->irte_entry, sizeof(struct irte));
and this:
+ struct irte_pi *irte_pi = (struct irte_pi *)irte;
Why not extending struct irte proper and avoid the whole void pointer
and mempcy and other crappola.
Patch below.
Thanks,
tglx
------------->
iommu: dmar: Extend struct irte for VT-d Posted-Interrrupts
The IRTE (Interrupt Remapping Table Entry) is either an entry for
remapped or for posted interrupts. The hardware distiguishes between
remapped and posted entries by bit 15 in the low 64 bit of the
IRTE. If cleared the entry is remapped, if set it's posted.
The entries have common fields and dependent on the posted bit fields
with different meanings.
Extend struct irte to handle the differences between remap and posted
mode by having three structs in the unions:
- Shared
- Remapped
- Posted
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/dmar.h | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: linux/include/linux/dmar.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/dmar.h
+++ linux/include/linux/dmar.h
@@ -185,28 +185,66 @@ static inline int dmar_device_remove(voi
struct irte {
union {
+ /* Shared between remap and posted mode*/
struct {
- __u64 present : 1,
- fpd : 1,
- dst_mode : 1,
- redir_hint : 1,
- trigger_mode : 1,
- dlvry_mode : 3,
- avail : 4,
- __reserved_1 : 4,
- vector : 8,
- __reserved_2 : 8,
- dest_id : 32;
+ __u64 present : 1, /* 0 */
+ fpd : 1, /* 1 */
+ __res0 : 6, /* 2 - 6 */
+ avail : 4, /* 8 - 11 */
+ __res1 : 3, /* 12 - 14 */
+ posted : 1, /* 15 */
+ vector : 8, /* 16 - 23 */
+ __res2 : 40; /* 24 - 63 */
+ };
+
+ /* Remap mode */
+ struct {
+ __u64 r_present : 1, /* 0 */
+ r_fpd : 1, /* 1 */
+ dst_mode : 1, /* 2 */
+ redir_hint : 1, /* 3 */
+ trigger_mode : 1, /* 4 */
+ dlvry_mode : 3, /* 5 - 7 */
+ r_avail : 4, /* 8 - 11 */
+ r_res1 : 4, /* 12 - 13 */
+ r_posted : 1, /* 15 */
+ r_vector : 8, /* 16 - 23 */
+ r_res2 : 8, /* 24 - 31 */
+ dest_id : 32; /* 32 - 63 */
+ };
+
+ /* Posted mode */
+ struct {
+ __u64 p_present : 1, /* 0 */
+ p_fpd : 1, /* 1 */
+ p_res0 : 6, /* 2 - 6 */
+ p_avail : 4, /* 8 - 11 */
+ p_res1 : 4, /* 12 - 13 */
+ p_urgent : 1, /* 14 */
+ p_posted : 1, /* 15 */
+ p_vector : 8, /* 16 - 23 */
+ p_res2 : 14, /* 24 - 37 */
+ pda_l : 26; /* 38 - 63 */
};
__u64 low;
};
union {
+ /* Shared between remap and posted mode*/
+ struct {
+ __u64 sid : 16, /* 64 - 79 */
+ sq : 2, /* 80 - 81 */
+ svt : 2, /* 82 - 83 */
+ __res3 : 44; /* 84 - 127 */
+ };
+
+ /* Posted mode*/
struct {
- __u64 sid : 16,
- sq : 2,
- svt : 2,
- __reserved_3 : 44;
+ __u64 p_sid : 16, /* 64 - 79 */
+ p_sq : 2, /* 80 - 81 */
+ p_svt : 2, /* 82 - 83 */
+ p_res3 : 12, /* 84 - 95 */
+ pda_h : 32; /* 96 - 127 */
};
__u64 high;
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists