linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] PM / Hibernate: prepare for SANITIZE_FREED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALUN=q+0mUTeJKE0OV8Bkny33M2Psdp4U5dF3vBcyo+mxNb-Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2015 14:07:36 +0200
From:	Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
To:	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] PM / Hibernate: prepare for SANITIZE_FREED_PAGES

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu> wrote:
>
>> Moreover, why is the resume code path the only one where freed pages need to
>> be sanitized?
>
> ... i had a bug report before (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=132871433416256)
> which is why i asked Anisse to figure this out before upstreaming the feature.
> i've also asked him already to explain why his approach is the proper fix for
> the problem (which should include the description of the root cause as a start)
> but he hasn't answered that yet.
>
> anyway, the big question is how there can be free memory pages after resume
> which are not sanitized. now i have no idea about the hibernation logic but
> i assume that it doesn't save/restore free pages so the question is how the
> kernel gets to learn about these free pages during resume and whether there's
> a path where __free_page() or some other wrapper around free_pages_prepare()
> doesn't get called at all.

In my opinion the free pages left are those used by the loading kernel.
If I understand correctly, a suspend (hibernate) image contains *all*
the memory necessary for the OS to work; so when you restore it, you
restore it all, page tables, and kernel code section included. So when
the kernel does a hibernate restoration, it loads it all the pages
into memory, then architecture-specific code will jump into the new
"resumed" kernel by restoring page table entries and CPU context. When
it does that, it leaves the "loader" kernel memory hanging; this
memory is seen as free pages by the resumed kernel, but it isn't
cleared.

Rafael, am I getting something wrong on the hibernation resume process
? What do you think of this analysis ?

Regards,

Anisse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/