[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555C7A47.1070901@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:12:55 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] serial: tegra: Correct error handling on DMA setup
On 20/05/15 10:51, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 20/05/15 04:57, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> There may still be a leak (that is not related to your patch) in the
>> RX path though:
>>
>> dma_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(...);
>> ret = dmaengine_slave_config(...);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> ...
>> goto scrub;
>> }
>>
>> tup->rx_dma_buf_virt = dma_buf;
>> tup->rx_dma_buf_phys = dma_phys;
>>
>> scrub:
>> dma_release_channel(dma_chan);
>> return ret;
>>
>> It seems that if dmaengine_slave_config() fails, then the result of
>> dma_alloc_coherent() remains purely local to the function and is never
>> freed. Or am I missing something again?
>
> Yes, you are right here. Actually, this would be applicable to
> both RX and TX paths because in the TX path the buffer would
> not be unmapped. I will generated a separate patch for fix
> this. How does the following look?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> index 3b63f103f0c9..cf0133ae762d 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
> @@ -999,6 +999,12 @@ static int tegra_uart_dma_channel_allocate(struct tegra_uart_port *tup,
> dma_release_channel(dma_chan);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> + dma_sconfig.src_addr = tup->uport.mapbase;
> + dma_sconfig.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
> + dma_sconfig.src_maxburst = 4;
> + tup->rx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> + tup->rx_dma_buf_virt = dma_buf;
> + tup->rx_dma_buf_phys = dma_phys;
> } else {
> dma_phys = dma_map_single(tup->uport.dev,
> tup->uport.state->xmit.buf, UART_XMIT_SIZE,
> @@ -1009,39 +1015,23 @@ static int tegra_uart_dma_channel_allocate(struct tegra_uart_port *tup,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> dma_buf = tup->uport.state->xmit.buf;
> - }
> -
> - if (dma_to_memory) {
> - dma_sconfig.src_addr = tup->uport.mapbase;
> - dma_sconfig.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
> - dma_sconfig.src_maxburst = 4;
> - } else {
> dma_sconfig.dst_addr = tup->uport.mapbase;
> dma_sconfig.dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
> dma_sconfig.dst_maxburst = 16;
> + tup->tx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> + tup->tx_dma_buf_virt = dma_buf;
> + tup->tx_dma_buf_phys = dma_phys;
> }
>
> ret = dmaengine_slave_config(dma_chan, &dma_sconfig);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(tup->uport.dev,
> "Dma slave config failed, err = %d\n", ret);
> - goto scrub;
> + tegra_uart_dma_channel_free(tup, dma_to_memory);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - if (dma_to_memory) {
> - tup->rx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> - tup->rx_dma_buf_virt = dma_buf;
> - tup->rx_dma_buf_phys = dma_phys;
> - } else {
> - tup->tx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> - tup->tx_dma_buf_virt = dma_buf;
> - tup->tx_dma_buf_phys = dma_phys;
> - }
> return 0;
> -
> -scrub:
> - tegra_uart_dma_channel_free(tup, dma_to_memory);
> - return ret;
> }
Posted the patch here [1].
Jon
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/20/347
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists