[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555C821F.7090104@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:46:23 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: at91sam9x5: fix usart1 sck pin definition
Le 20/05/2015 14:41, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 20/05/2015 at 14:36:10 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
>> SCK1 pin is pioC 29. Comment was okay.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
>> index 9c236c317eeb..dfdbdf43860e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
>> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
>>
>> pinctrl_usart1_sck: usart1_sck-0 {
>> atmel,pins =
>> - <AT91_PIOC 28 AT91_PERIPH_C AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PC29 periph C */
>> + <AT91_PIOC 29 AT91_PERIPH_C AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PC29 periph C */
>
> I think you should remove the comment. As you can see, it didn't help ;)
I agree, but didn't do it in this patch because the whole file is
stuffed with these useless comments... We'd better do it in a single
patch or... leave it like this...
Bye,
>> };
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.3
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists