[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520132044.GD2729@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:20:44 -0400
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav.pandit@...gotech.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NVMe: nvme_queue made cache friendly.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:01:03PM -0400, Parav Pandit wrote:
> nvme_queue structure made 64B cache friendly so that majority of the
> data elements of the structure during IO and completion path can be
> found in typical single 64B cache line size which was previously spanning beyond
> single 64B cache line size.
Have you done any performance measurements on this? I find it hard to
believe that moving q_lock to the second 64B cache line results in a
performance improvement. Seems to me it would result in a performance
loss, since you have to grab the lock before operating on the queue,
and cache line prefetching tends to prefetch the _next_ line, not the
_previous_ line.
> @@ -98,23 +98,23 @@ struct async_cmd_info {
> struct nvme_queue {
> struct device *q_dmadev;
> struct nvme_dev *dev;
> - char irqname[24]; /* nvme4294967295-65535\0 */
> - spinlock_t q_lock;
> struct nvme_command *sq_cmds;
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> volatile struct nvme_completion *cqes;
> - dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
> - dma_addr_t cq_dma_addr;
> u32 __iomem *q_db;
> u16 q_depth;
> - s16 cq_vector;
> u16 sq_head;
> u16 sq_tail;
> u16 cq_head;
> u16 qid;
> + s16 cq_vector;
> u8 cq_phase;
> u8 cqe_seen;
> + spinlock_t q_lock;
> struct async_cmd_info cmdinfo;
> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> + char irqname[24]; /* nvme4294967295-65535\0 */
> + dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
> + dma_addr_t cq_dma_addr;
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists