[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1505201636410.8186@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:38:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: nick <xerofoify@...il.com>
cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] hid:Change vendor id for USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3
to correct id in hid-ids.h
On Wed, 20 May 2015, nick wrote:
> That's a good question and we discussed with Alan about this. Basically
> the only id that works on non JP models is the one he checked.
And now you are removing it.
> Your right there may be two vendor ids for the product a.k.a maybe for
> revisions however to my knowledge there have been no major revisions of
> the Surface Pro Three. In addition what is the likely hood that a vendor
> has two ids for the same area
It's quite common to have multiple PIDs for devices with the same
internals.
> in the world, as I can't think of one vendor that does this unless
> differencing between two of the products is important a.k.a like MAC
> addresses
MAC address is about distinguishing individial device instances from each
other. PIDs are something completely different.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists