linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v2 06/14] genirq: Move field 'handler_data' from struct irq_data into struct irq_common

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505201628400.4225@nanos>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2015 16:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	bob picco <bpicco@...oft.net>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 06/14] genirq: Move field 'handler_data' from struct
 irq_data into struct irq_common_data

On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:

> Handler data (handler_data) is per-irq instead of per irqchip, so move
> it into struct irq_common_data.

For review and debugging sake, please do the same split as you did
with node. Convert first and then move. 5 patches this time:

Sparc: 
>  arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c    |   15 +++++++++------
>  arch/sparc/kernel/sun4d_irq.c |    4 ++--
>  arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c |    6 ++++--

x86:
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c    |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c        |    4 ++--

gpio:
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c   |    2 +-

sh:
>  drivers/sh/intc/virq.c        |    4 ++--

Move:
>  include/linux/irq.h           |    8 ++++----
>  include/linux/irqdesc.h       |    2 +-
>  kernel/irq/chip.c             |    2 +-
>  kernel/irq/irqdesc.c          |    3 ++-

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index c5e05c82d67c..477d5b8616ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data *data, unsigned trigger)
>  	struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
>  	u32 mask;
>  
> -	d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller *)data->handler_data;
> +	d = (struct davinci_gpio_controller *)irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);

This type cast is silly, handler_data is (void *)

>  	g = (struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *)d->regs;
>  	mask = __gpio_mask(data->irq - d->gpio_irq);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/sh/intc/virq.c b/drivers/sh/intc/virq.c
> index f30ac9354ff2..3dbc21696924 100644
> --- a/drivers/sh/intc/virq.c
> +++ b/drivers/sh/intc/virq.c
> @@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ static int add_virq_to_pirq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int virq)
>  	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>  
>  	/* scan for duplicates */
> -	last = (struct intc_virq_list **)&data->handler_data;
> -	for_each_virq(entry, data->handler_data) {
> +	last = (struct intc_virq_list **)&data->common->handler_data;

That does not make sense. You convert the one below, but not that one
to the accessor function.

handler_data is a pointer to a struct intc_virq_list. So 

	struct intc_virq_list **last, *entry, *head; 

	head = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
	last = &head;
	
	for_each_virq(entry, head) {
		....
	}

Would be clean code and lets you convert all usage sites of
data->handler_data before actually doing the move to common data.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/