[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520152607.GK18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:26:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in
x86_schedule_events
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:49:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 1a3bf48..a4f93fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7391,13 +7391,16 @@ static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)
> ctx = perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(event->group_leader,
> SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> BUG_ON(!ctx);
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
> }
>
> event->pmu = pmu;
> ret = pmu->event_init(event);
>
> - if (ctx)
> + if (ctx) {
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
> perf_event_ctx_unlock(event->group_leader, ctx);
> + }
>
> if (ret)
> module_put(pmu->module);
Except of course that ->event_init() likes to do an allocation :/
Needs to be fixed differently.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists